I think I’m going to do simple Array sorting. I don’t need automatic sorting handled in binding. It’s probably a bad idea in general anyway. Sorting is much less performant in Javascript when you need sort functions. The Flash default sorts are pretty low level.
On Jul 8, 2016, at 8:14 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Please don't copy in the regular Flex ArrayCollection. IIRC it drags in a > whole ton of crap. > > If you want sorting, maybe add sorting beads to ArrayList or a subclass of > ArrayList. No need to bake sorting functionality into a particular > collection implementation. We want loosely-coupled, pay-as-you-go > features where we can. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > > On 7/7/16, 1:45 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It looks like there’s one place where I’m actually using ArrayCollection >> to do object sorting. I might need to work around this issue or bring in >> ArrayCollection. >> >> On Jul 6, 2016, at 5:10 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 7/6/16, 7:04 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I use ArrayCollection a lot in my Flex code. The Collection project in >>>> FlexJS does not have ArrayCollection, so there’s no way to just change >>>> a >>>> package name in that code. Is ArrayList a drop-in for ArrayCollection? >>> >>> org.apache.flex.collections.ArrayList is more like Spark/MX ArrayList. >>> ArrayCollection would have more functionality like filtering and proxy >>> access via []. >>> >>> The MX/Spark port to FlexJS will have to reproduce the legacy >>> ArrayCollection. It's been a while since I've worked on the port but >>> you >>> can look in the branch if you want. It depends on what you used >>> ArrayCollection for. >>> >>> -Alex >>> >> >
