No need to re-release anything at this point, and I doubt Adobe will push for it.
These changes are not final yet. Adobe Legal wanted to see how it looked, and our community deserved to see how it might look before it goes final. Adobe might have further suggestions, then we'll have a better idea of what the Mavenizer will need to do, but where the Mavenizer causes the distribution Adobe artifacts, Adobe Legal will want to review how it looks as well before it goes final. And we can update other scripts then as well. Do we cause the downloading of Adobe artifacts in TDF and our other non-SDK releases? If so, then we should review that as well for those next releases. -Alex On 7/7/16, 10:36 PM, "Justin Mclean" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >In order to comply with whatever it was that Adobe legal sent you, can >you please explain: >- What needs to change in the mazinizer? >- What needs to be to change in the scripts that install the Flash player >/ AIR versions and build an SDK for use with an IDE? (see scripts in >FLexSDK /ide and /ide/flashbuilder) >- What need to change in build.xml when prompted for Adobe downloads? >- Similarly what needs to change in the jenkins.xml? >- What if anything needs to change in TourDeFlex? >- Are there any other changes we need to make when making any future >releases of any of the Flex artefacts we have already released? >- If any of the currently published release artefacts are not in >compliance do we need to re-release them? >- Do we need to take down any releases that is not in complaince? > >Thanks, >Justin
