Jeah I even found out that I even did a release of at least the mavenized artifacts ... Must have forgotten that ;-)
And I did a little comparison between ant and Maven and noticed that I now build two more swcs and compile some more classes. So that's probably the reason for the code garbage not causing problems. But that's now fixed :-) Chris Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> Datum: 05.07.16 19:40 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: [FlexUnit] Have we ever built or released this? We definitely build and release flexunit. There is a nightly build for it on apacheflexbuilds. But I think you discovered that the Ant build may not be building "everything". -Alex On 7/5/16, 6:41 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >Well ... whatever, I created a new branch and setup a build-job to build >it: > >https://builds.apache.org/view/E-G/view/Flex/job/flex-flexunit%20(maven)/7 >/console > > >Success tastes so sweet :-) > > >But I'll have to investigate if the Ant build does additional stuff that >I haven't implemented yet. For now it produces the same SWCs, if they >have the same content, I'll/we'll have to verify. > > >Chris > >________________________________ >Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Juli 2016 14:05:17 >An: 'dev@flex.apache.org' >Betreff: [FlexUnit] Have we ever built or released this? > >Hi, > > >I was having some spare time waiting for some "business processes" to >grant me some privileges, so being sort of stuck for asjs at the moment, >I decided to give FlexUnit a try in building this with maven. > > >I did have to add a few minor additions to my plugin but I managed to get >most of the project to build with Maven. But I did notice a lot of stuff >I can't imagine that we ever managed to get it running with Ant in the >first place. Now my question is: Did we ever build FlexUnit with Ant at >Apache? If not do you mind if I fix stuff in there without going the >extra mile with a separate branch? > > >Chris
