Thanks for the links. I looks like the unlicensed license is a derivative of the CC0 license, so if I’m reading it right, it’s binding and about as permissive as you can get.
I’m not clear on what you are suggesting we do. I’d like to pretty much include some of the code (with minor modifications) in an ActionScript class. What would we add to where? If we need to add something, I thought NOTICE made sense, but I’m not very clear on these things. On Jul 1, 2016, at 4:47 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> Is there any problem just adopting the part of the code relevant to UTF8? Do >> we need to add a notice? > > Not that I can see but public domain is complex [1], but adding something to > LICENSE is the current advice. It would be best to get [2] added to [3] > and/or [1] by asking on legal discuss. > > I can’t see any reason why it would not be added/accepted. > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#can-works-placed-in-the-public-domain-be-included-in-apache-products > 2. http://unlicense.org > 3. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
