I think that test has a @ignore on the entire test class.

-Alex

On 3/22/16, 12:32 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:

>Another thing I just noticed while separating the tests that I need to
>adjust from the ones I need to move:
>Ho can the test TestExternJQuery pass? In the configure it creates a path:
>        String coreRoot =
>ExternalsTestUtils.EXTERNAL_JS_DIR.getAbsolutePath();
>        config.addExternal(coreRoot + "/jquery-1.9.js");
>
>The stupid thing is this evaluates to
>"../externs/js/externs/jquery-1.9.js" but this file does not exist as it
>should be "../externs/jquery/externs/jquery-1.9.js" ... so I would like
>to state that I mistrust this test ;-)
>
>Chris
>
>________________________________________
>Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com <carlos.rov...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von
>Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>
>Gesendet: Sonntag, 20. März 2016 09:29
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: AW: [FALCONJX] Some help with the externs
>
>Amazing work Chris! Thanks to share your progress! :)
>
>2016-03-19 14:33 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
>
>> YESSSS!!!!!
>>
>> I finally managed to port the builds for ALL externs to maven. I was
>> thinking about how I could de-couple the compiler and the maven plugin
>>till
>> I noticed that this was exactly the problem I always had with Flexmojos
>>and
>> what I created the Flex tool-api for. With this it was super easy to
>>create
>> universal Maven plugins for externc and mxmlc.
>>
>> Currently the maven build is far from perfect ... currently I reference
>> the js.swc via relative paths, which is a super no-go for production,
>>but
>> at least I can build and as Ant used relative paths it's not even a step
>> back :-)
>>
>> Also every module is currently still a "jar" project and hence maven
>> produces "jar" files in the target, all of which are probably completely
>> empty. In order to address this I will actually have to provide a custom
>> lifecycle mapping which will make the hack more and more real flex
>>support
>> for maven.
>>
>> Now I have to find out how to separate the tests that currently use
>>other
>> parts of the build and move them into a dedicated "testsuite" module.
>>
>> But I think for now the hardest steps have been taken.
>>
>> Now I'm going to actually start programming my Cyborg ... don't want to
>> arrive at ApacheCon with nothing to show ;-)
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
>> Gesendet: Samstag, 19. März 2016 11:02
>> An: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Betreff: AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Some help with the externs
>>
>> Ok ... so have a look at this image :-)
>> 
>>http://s21.postimg.org/lx4dux0jr/Bildschirmfoto_2016_03_19_um_10_53_31.pn
>>g
>>
>> I finally managed to finish a first build of an extern swc, using Maven
>> and using my brand-new externc and compiler Maven plugins. My plugins
>>are
>> currently a simple prototype wich I am hoping to extend to support
>> everything needed to build the test cases in the test suite. As the
>>rest of
>> the compiler blows up if you leave the 100% correct path at least I
>>have no
>> pressure to make it perfect ... so I'll stick to "it doesn't blow up if
>>you
>> do everything correct"-strategy for now, which makes things a lot
>>simpler
>> (but also unusable for others)
>>
>> Currently my plugins are tightly coupled with compiler and compiler.jx
>>...
>> this would complicate the build, so I think I'm going to use my
>>Tool-API to
>> decouple them. And I am going to write the plugin in the falcon repo as
>>it
>> makes things very complicated as long as not everything is released at
>> least once.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
>> Gesendet: Samstag, 19. März 2016 09:19
>> An: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Betreff: AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Some help with the externs
>>
>> I'm using this one:
>>
>>                     <dependency>
>>                         <groupId>com.google.javascript</groupId>
>>                 
>><artifactId>closure-compiler-externs</artifactId>
>>                         <version>v20150609</version>
>>                     </dependency>
>>
>> But your post was very valuable input as I re-checked and found out that
>> the closure compiler version has changed. So I updated to that version
>>an
>> now I do have a browser directory and the number of errors went down to
>>2
>> ;-) ... thanks Alex :-)
>>
>> Guess I sticked to the versions I once found out ant stuck into my
>> hand-written poms I used to create maven bundles. Should double check
>>all
>> of them, if there were version updates.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. März 2016 21:18
>> An: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: AW: [FALCONJX] Some help with the externs
>>
>> On 3/18/16, 12:15 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
>>wrote:
>>
>> >Currently I'm working on the last module "js". Unfortunately this seems
>> >to be the "playerglobal" of FlexJS :-( ... one thing I noticed, was
>>that
>> >the "externs/js/externs" directory contains the content of the
>> >externs.zip which is embedded in google's closure compiler. So far so
>> >good, but looking at the build, the zip is extracted to the
>> >"externs/js/externs" directory, but strangely the files are structured
>> >with a "browser" directory. The original zip however doesn't contain
>>any
>> >directories, so where does that directory structure come from?
>>
>> My copy of externs.zip expands to have a browser folder.  Older versions
>> didn't.  And it might be that newer ones don't as well.  Which version
>>of
>> Google Closure Compiler are you using?
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>
>
>
>--
>
>Carlos Rovira
>Director General
>M: +34 607 22 60 05
>http://www.codeoscopic.com
>http://www.avant2.es
>
>
>Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
>información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
>error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
>proceda a su destrucción.
>
>De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
>comunicamos
>que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
>S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
>servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
>rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
>nuestras
>oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
>necesaria.

Reply via email to