On 3/13/16, 3:53 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Ok so it seems that I will have to convert each one into a dedicated >maven module. This will take some time :-( Unfortunately, that's probably true. IMO, there is some source, usually JS, which is downloaded, sometimes modified by script, or handwritten. A few like GCL have AS source. If there is JS source, it is then converted to AS output. Then a SWC is built in the "usual" way. HTH, -Alex > >Eventually I'll create a maven-plugin to build the externs but for now >I'll start creating the artifacts individually until I find out how to >setup a common build. > >Chris > >________________________________________ >Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. März 2016 06:14 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 > >I assume you mean "externs". > >There are now 8 extern swcs, and they are created with at least 3 >different formulas. > >GCL.swc is created from .AS files in GCL/src >createjs.swc has its own build.xml that downloads the CreateJS source, >does a bunch of replace/sed on that source. >I have not looked at how node.swc is created. >cordova.swc is created from .JS files we made up. >jquery, jasmine, google_maps are created by downloading from github. In >the Ant build, the download happens in compiler.jx/downloads.xml >For JS.swc, the compiler.jx/downloads.xml also downloads the Google >Closure Compiler source, and in GCC source is a file called externs.zip >which contains the files used for js.swc (along with missing.js which we >wrote). > >HTH, >-Alex > >On 3/12/16, 1:04 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > >>Hi Alex (or anyone able to explain to me the thing with the "externals") >> >>What is the externals directory and how is it built? It sort of looks as >>if Ant downloads stuff and unpacks it in the externals directory but it's >>really tricky to understand what's actually happening. I want to >>replicate the behaviour in Maven, but this is hard, if you don't >>understand what's actually going on. >> >>Chris >> >>________________________________________ >>Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >>Gesendet: Samstag, 12. März 2016 20:01 >>An: dev@flex.apache.org >>Betreff: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 >> >>Well I'm currently down to 0 errors and failures for "compiler" and >>managed to get "compiler.jx" down to: >> >>Tests run: 1274, Failures: 15, Errors: 26, Skipped: 9 >> >>I guess the ones still failing have to be related to the externs modules. >>These are the ones I'm dealing with at the moment. >> >>Well I'm currently making great progress on this topic and hoping to have >>it finished till ApacheCon ... I just didn't want a release to hold me >>back for long. How long would I have to keep my feet still in case of a >>release? >> >>Chris >> >>________________________________________ >>Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >>Gesendet: Samstag, 12. März 2016 16:09 >>An: dev@flex.apache.org >>Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 >> >>On 3/12/16, 3:56 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >> >>>I am currently on the finishing line of preparing falcon and falcon.jx >>>to >>>be converted to Maven. >>>For this I will probably need to do a few more tweaks of the testsuite, >>>but it's looking good. >> >>Wow! Great progress! >> >>> >>>When are you planning on cutting the release branch? >> >>Are you asking about getting the Maven integration into the 0.6.0 >>release? >> Or just trying to merge it into develop after I cut the release branch? >> >>-Alex >> >
