Node.js has its own require system. It's called CommonJS.
I was thinking that it could also be based on imported classes. It can be a
little tricky, though. A module is pretty flexible with what it exports.
Most simply, a module could export a single class. In this case, the
translation is pretty simple:
//as
import SomeClass;
//js
var SomeClass = require("SomeClass");
However, a module could export multiple classes or even functions too, more
like an ActionScript package. It might work something like this:
//as
import fs.readFileSync; //function
import fs.ReadStream; //class
//js
var readFileSync = require("fs").readFileSync;
var ReadStream = require("fs").ReadStream;
That's for the core modules. You can also require() modules using a
relative path. If we were to allow the ability to emit classes as CommonJS
modules, we might use the following syntax. In a class in the top-level
package, it might look like this:
//as
import com.example.RelativeClass;
//js
var RelativeClass = require("./com/example/RelativeClass");
But for something in com/example, it would look like this:
//as
import com.example.RelativeClass;
//js
var RelativeClass = require("./RelativeClass");
- Josh
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/2/15, 9:59 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >The require() call for a Node.js module should probably be generated in
> >the
> >PackageHeaderEmitter, where the goog.require() calls are generated.
>
> OK, but based on what kind of source code lines? The goog.requires are
> generated from import statements, although we might change that to being
> generated by explicit instantiation of a class someday.
>
> I think you are saying you want to replace the goog.require subsystem with
> some other require subsystem in order to get node.js to work. Is node.js
> using RequireJS or their own require system? The work item may be to
> finally getting around to supporting alternative require subsystems.
>
> -Alex
>
>
