He obviously knows about this project and would have chimed in if he was remotely interested in contributing.
IMHO -1 because he has already put massive time into his implementation and likes the fact he controls how it evolves. If this project is interested in Node.js, then it's all open source and people could get ideas from his project but other than that, leave it... Mike On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 11/27/15, 8:56 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >-1 > >I dont think we should dignify this attempt at spreading FUD. I am not > >sure if we should 'join forces' with someone like this. > > Hmm. What did you see as FUD? IMO, his summary of FlexJS was technically > correct to the public until we released 0.5.0, which was long after he > blogged. > > -Alex > >
