BTW, there’s a good JXON doc on MDN here[1] Maybe there’s some way to have a dynamic object as a property of XML so all XML methods could get proxied to XML.xmlObj?
[1]https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JXON On Nov 12, 2015, at 10:02 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So, given all that, if your XML class is dynamic, and attributes are just >> added to the instance as properties with the @prefix and child nodes are >> arrays of the child node name, I think that delete will do the right thing. > > Yes. attributes can be prefixed with “@“, but what about element names which > might conflict with function names? For example I could easily see someone > have some xml which looks like this:<catalog><name > title=“something”/></catalog> “name would then conflict with “name()”. > > I was thinking of having one array of elements and another for properties. > Mapping delete to something like that sounds tricky.
