On 9/22/15, 8:44 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>So in general I shouldn't need to worry about that directory and all >should be in the core.swc for example (This would have been where I would >be expecting it to be). Yes, everything should be in the SWCs. The default scripts that launch mxmlc point to that directory so folks can monkey-patch. You don’t have to allow it in the Maven config, but it could turn out to be useful to a monkey-patcher someday. At one point in time, before we packaged JS in the SWCs, we used that folder heavily. > >And regarding the problems of FB ... would it do any harm, if we simply >stuffed the manifests inside the swcs AND left them in the file system >for FB to work with? This way real tools could work with a clean >structure and wouldn't have to adopt hacks needed because of FB being >"slightly out of date" ;-) (sorry ... couldn't resist ;-) ) Yeah, you can package more stuff in the SWCs if you want. Do it soon as I want to get a release out sooner rather than later. -Alex
