Hi, > It is always hard to know what the “right” thing to do is, but note that > in [3], sebb recommends listing non-ASF AL2.0 dependencies in LICENSE.
Which probably doesn’t apply here as it’s a different situation i.e. in that case the font in question is a binary file whose license wasn’t obvious as you need to look at the font meta data in order to determine that. > Well, that is reasonable reasoning, however, our last advice on this topic > is here at [4] which would imply no change to NOTICE. Again this applies to bundling a binary font file which is different to bundling several source files with Apache headers. Thanks, Justin
