Ah ok. That’s probably a bug. Not sure why, but the emitters currently
initialize private members in the constructor. We discussed on some other
thread a while back that this shouldn’t be necessary except for non-scalar
initializers, so probably we should try to change this someday.
-Alex
On 6/25/15, 5:30 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>That remains me, if I change my start() function to either public or
>>>private, the cross compiled one is Main.prototype.start = function()
>>>hence it becomes public, only the @public / @private annotation changes,
>>>is that expected ?
>>
>> I’m not sure I understand. What was it otherwise?
>
>Using inner construstor functions:
>
>--------------------------------------
>- Public function
>--------------------------------------
>
>public class Main {
> public function start():void {
> HtmlContainer.load([JQUERY_SCRIPT], run);
> }
>}
>
>/**
> * @constructor
> */
>Main = function() {
> /**
> * @public
> */
> this.start = function() {
> HtmlContainer.load([Main.JQUERY_SCRIPT], Main.run);
> };
>};
>
>--------------------------------------
>- Private function
>--------------------------------------
>
>public class Main {
> private function start():void {
> HtmlContainer.load([Main.JQUERY_SCRIPT], run);
> }
>}
>
>
>/**
> * @constructor
> */
>Main = function() {
> /**
> * @private
> */
> start = function() {
> HtmlContainer.load([Main.JQUERY_SCRIPT], Main.run);
> };
>};
>
>
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>----------------------------------------
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
>>we now have 1.9 in AS
>> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:57:48 +0000
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/24/15, 6:43 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> When we wrote js we were not sure of naming conventions. Google
>>>seems to like backing variables to end with dash but flex starts with
>>>dash. Not sure what to do. I'm thinking we change to end with dash.
>>>
>>>Even though those 2 properties are public ?
>>
>> Sorry, I took a closer look. There shouldn’t be _ on those properties.
>> Keep in mind that there has been relatively little testing on this code.
>> We get the examples to work and call it “done for now”.
>>
>>>
>>>That remains me, if I change my start() function to either public or
>>>private, the cross compiled one is Main.prototype.start = function()
>>>hence it becomes public, only the @public / @private annotation changes,
>>>is that expected ?
>>
>> I’m not sure I understand. What was it otherwise?
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>
