This is what I am into right now; :)

visitScript
239        ASSIGN 0 58
239          GETPROP 0 21
239            GETPROP 0 15
239              NAME 0 5 Array
245              NAME 6 9 prototype
255            NAME 16 5 every
263          FUNCTION 24 34
272            NAME 9 8 callback
282            NAME 19 11 opt_thisobj
295            BLOCK 32 2

302        ASSIGN 0 53
302          GETPROP 0 11
302            NAME 0 5 Array
308            NAME 6 5 every
316          FUNCTION 14 39
325            NAME 9 3 arr
330            NAME 14 8 callback
340            NAME 24 11 opt_context
353            BLOCK 37 2

[function_static_test] Array.every : Has function conflict.


There are some weird stuff I have to resolve, I am working on the es3.js
right now, it combined with es5.js should be our new "playerglobal.swc".

I am unit testing the hell out of this stuff so it should be solid when it
hits prime time. I just wrote a bunch of tests for the "Stupid Crazy" GCC
type annotations, that replaced my hack type parsing yesterday.

I took 2 days Thurs and Fri(today) to see what I could get done. I have to
be honest, unless things really get rolling with the tests today where
these little issues iron out fast with my tests, it will be a week or so
before I check in code, I am working in a test project right now.

When I plan on commiting this code is when I get JS.swc and DOM.swc
compiling. Which JS.swc will be es3.js and es5.js, I will have to talk with
you guys about what comprises DON.swc, it will at least be w3c_dom1.js,
w3c_dom2.js, w3c_dom3.js, w3c_css1.js, w3c_range.js and some more.

You see there are dependencies that these files hav on each other, Om, if
you wanted to help me out, go through the GitHub externals repo files and
figure out what files need to be our standard DOM.swc.

Mike










On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 6/5/15, 8:18 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Jun 5, 2015 3:12 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> @Om ... SVG, this should get you excited. :)
> >>
> >> http://snag.gy/xEpfa.jpg
> >>
> >> Mike
> >
> >Fantastic!   What a great way to stay the day :-)
> >
> >When will we able to start testing all this?
>
> Whenever you help us get it packaged up. ;-)
>
> I have several things in my queue:
> -ASDOC for Falcon
> -ASDOC for Windows
> -Installer 3.2 release
> -Quarterly Report
> -Falcon and FlexJS build scripts.
>
> The latter should get the nightly builds closer to working with IJ.  This
> stuff Mike’s been working on will likely get folded into Falcon and/or
> FlexJS build scripts and result in other packages.  But if you help out
> things will get done sooner.
>
> -Alex
>
>

Reply via email to