As far as packages go, I think if a class is top-level in JavaScript, it
should be the same in ActionScript. At least by default.

- Josh

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 6/4/15, 9:53 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Yeah to be honest my main concern was these SWCs. When I started testing
> >the emitter for DOM stuff like I showed the other day, I couldn't
> >"believe"
> >in it because I was using the Randori stuff.
> >
> >Now with this, the first step is actually real and under the project's
> >control, all of it.
> >
> >1. I'm going to use packages, what should the package be for the DOM.swc
> >and JS.swc(was builtin.swc)?
>
> If you mean the AS package for the classes in these SWCs, I have to admit
> I was a bit surprised to see in the AS output example that Document in a
> “dom” package.  I would think these two SWCs would not have their classes
> in any AS package (IOW, “package {“).  Aren’t classes like Document
> effectively global just like Math?
>
> >2. I am using Rhino and QDox(hack for getting an easy parser for the
> >jsdocs), so I guess a download jar entry is going to have to be added to
> >the build script? I am not good at ant.
>
> Rhino 1.74 or later is MPL.  If we don’t need an earlier version then yes
> we can download it and Qdox (which is AL).  Just check in code that uses
> these jars (but not the jars) and I’ll get the build scripts to download
> them.
>
>
> >3. How is the source files going to be handled for the extern files?
> >Download them during build and then run the tool?
>
> IMO, yes.  But we might bundle them in the source release package.
>
> >4. I think I am going to utilize that JavaScript metadata tag for these so
> >it's easy to resolve stuff during compile.
>
> I guess that’s ok with me.  Why do you not want to introduce new metadata
> keywords and/or use asdoc similar to how goog is using jsdoc?  I’d worry
> about a JavaScript metadata statement getting longer and longer as we add
> more attributes to it.  Having each attribute be a keyword or asdoc/jsdoc
> tag seems like it would be more manageable?
>
> -Alex
>
>

Reply via email to