Yeah it is but we were talking about property super calls and this was
brought up.
Alex, understand I am ignorant here with js. I probably have 100+ emails
now pleading for somebody to tell me how I should emitter super calls to
properties.
Josh wasn't keen on the whole GCC dependency but we then talked about class
loading.
So... I still need to know how I should do this (accessors).
Mainly this took me 1 hour so it just got me into the AST better, it's been
a while.
Mike
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Maybe I’m not understanding, but the output didn’t look like JS to me. It
> looked like data that goes into some _createClass abstraction. Which is
> fine, but a bit spooky if we want to claim “vanilla”.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 5/29/15, 1:39 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Oh yeah, the .as for this is;
> >
> >
> >
> >package com.model
> >{
> >
> >import randori.webkit.page.Window;
> >
> >public class ClassA
> >{
> > private var _property:String = "init";
> >
> > public function get property():String
> > {
> > return _property;
> > }
> >
> > public function set property(value:String):void
> > {
> > _property = value;
> > }
> >
> > public function ClassA()
> > {
> > }
> >
> > public function showValue():void
> > {
> > Window.alert(_property);
> > }
> >}
> >}
> >
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Michael Schmalle
> ><teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have been throwing stuff at the wall today and one thing I wanted a
> >>POC
> >> of is the output of Babble since it "seems" to have an implementation of
> >> super accessor calls.
> >>
> >> So using the same JXEmitter, I have composed sub emitters and I have
> >>only
> >> overridden 2 (ClassEmitter, MethodEmitter) to get this output from the
> >> previous I showed with TypeScript output.
> >>
> >> So it seems baring all the stuff that comes with this, we have a couple
> >> options which will need to be hashed out later about "what" is going to
> >>be
> >> output.
> >>
> >> These emitters can easily be configured, so we can have different types
> >>of
> >> output for people's use cases.
> >>
> >> var ClassA = (function () {
> >> function ClassA() {
> >> _classCallCheck(this, ClassA);
> >>
> >> this._property = "init";
> >> }
> >>
> >> _createClass(ClassA, [
> >> {
> >> key: "property",
> >> get: function () {
> >> return this._property;
> >> },
> >> ",
> >> set: function (value) {
> >> this._property = value;
> >> }
> >> },
> >> {
> >> key: "showValue",
> >> value: function showValue() {
> >> alert(this._property);
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> ]);
> >> })();
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
>
>
