On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Good. All of these pieces seem to be Apache compatible. We still need to > figure out how to create the two SWCs in an Apache-compatible way, but I > don’t expect to get blocked there. > > Ok, All my work is riding on this Alex. :) Mike > -Alex > > On 5/29/15, 1:05 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Of the main repo README > >" > > > >This project is licensed under the MIT license. > > > >Copyrights on the definition files are respective of each contributor > >listed at the beginning of each definition file. > > > >" > > > >Mike > > > > > >On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Michael Schmalle > ><teotigraphix...@gmail.com > >> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/borisyankov/DefinitelyTyped/blob/master/canvasjs/canva > >>sjs.d.ts > >> > >> For example. > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> > >>> If I understand, you are planning to grab a d.ts file from somewhere > >>>and > >>> translate it. Give us an example of one you plan to use. It should > >>>have > >>> a header in it or some licensing associated with it. That’s the info > >>>that > >>> will help determine if it is “safe”. > >>> > >>> On 5/29/15, 12:49 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> >Well, if it's Apache safe I am already planning on writing a parser > >>>and > >>> >renderer to .as files. > >>> > > >>> >So someone that knows, should investigate because I have no idea about > >>> >licenses. > >>> > > >>> >I was actually thinking about writing it in TypeScript because I > >>>think it > >>> >has it's own parser. I am investigating this, if not I will write a > >>> >tokenizer in Java or something. > >>> > > >>> >Mike > >>> > > >>> >On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> > >>> >wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> This would be really helpful! I'm all for piggy-backing off the work > >>> the > >>> >> TypeScript community did (with proper credit where it's due, of > >>> >>course), so > >>> >> that we don't need to start from scratch. > >>> >> > >>> >> - Josh > >>> >> > >>> >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Michael Schmalle < > >>> >> teotigraphix...@gmail.com > >>> >> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> > Hi, > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Is this considered reverse engineering? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Does it violate Apache's terms in anyway? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Mike > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
