Thanks Justin, it’s not controversial it’s just not doctrine
and stating that the board recommends it and then citing minutes
from over a decade ago don’t make it any more recommended than
anything else. 

The past 2 boards that I’ve been on have never brought it up;
and since I have been participating actively at the foundation
(2005-*) it’s never been a board level issue. It’s a community
issue. No one in Flex has objected, so please proceed, however
I will state again it’s not a board level issue.

Cheers,
Chris




-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com>
Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org>
Date: Sunday, March 22, 2015 at 1:31 AM
To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Author tags in SDK code

>Hi,
>
>> Just FYI: it’s not recommended by the ASF board that @author
>> tags be removed.
>
>There has been a few board discussions about it [1][2] (and elsewhere)
>which I've seen referenced a few times. A number of other projects have
>removed them [3]. [1] states "Recommend strongly that @author is avoided"
>which is saying something slightly different from removing existing ones
>I agree.
>
>I asked on list a few weeks back and there was no objection to removing
>them. [4] Alex's words were along the lines of it's your itch scratch it.
>[5] So I certainly can't see it being controversial, but if anyone feels
>it is it is please speak up as those changes can be easily reverted. (And
>just to be clear the tags in 3rd party code have been left alone and are
>still there.)
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
>
>1. 
>http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2004/board_minutes_2004_0
>9_22.txt  (see 7F)
>2. 
>http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2004/board_minutes_2004_0
>2_18.txt (see 5D)
>3. 
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1523?jql=text%20~%20%22remove
>%20author%20tags%22
>4. http://markmail.org/message/lfsecyl74ifkrdqz
>5. http://markmail.org/message/3gt4eoxvp7qgxeqc


Reply via email to