Alex,

Can you please take a look?  We are getting more complaints about this on
the list and on twitter.
I just tried it and the problem is still there.

Thanks,
Om

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

> IMO, we need to coordinate so only one person is trying to fix this.  Last
> time, I gave up because others were tweaking the config file at the same
> time.
>
> All it should require is debugging, but keep in mind that if you change
> the config file, you should change all three places where AIR17 and
> Flash17 have entries, and that it may have been a while since we saw a
> beta that didn’t already have a release version so the patterns in recent
> SVN history may not apply perfectly, or there could just be a bug.  IOW,
> most often recently, the config file had entries for both FPxx and
> FPxxBeta and not just FPyy as a Beta.
>
> If you guys really can’t figure it out, I’ll try to take a look mid-week.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 2/22/15, 3:45 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >This is the earlier thread where I reported the same error.  Let's
> >continue
> >to discuss the issue here since it has more details.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:40 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com
> >
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm, tried again (twice)  Still getting the same exact error.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> SVN history shows some patterns that supposedly work correctly.  I just
> >>> updated to those.  Give it a try.
> >>>
> >>> On 2/9/15, 11:48 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >Alex, any guess as to what could be happening here?
> >>> >
> >>> >Thanks,
> >>> >Om
> >>> >
> >>> >On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:45 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>> ><bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> I added the attributes version="17.0b" versionID="17.0b"
> >>> >>
> >>> >> That doesn't seem to have fixed it.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Thanks,
> >>> >> Om
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:11 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>> >><bigosma...@gmail.com
> >>> >> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
> >>>wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> The call stack shows it is an <equals> tag.  You can use the
> >>> >>>>expressions
> >>> >>>> window to view a tag instance’s xml property to see which tag it
> >>>is.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> In this case, it is:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> <equals arg1="${flash.sdk.swfversion}"
> >>> >>>> arg2="${flash.sdk.default.swfversion}"/>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> It appears that the install script is expecting the versionID in
> >>>the
> >>> >>>> installer config to be 17.0b
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>> I see that "version" is set to 17.0.  Should that be changed to
> >>>17.0b
> >>> ?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Thanks,
> >>> >>> Om
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> -Alex
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On 2/8/15, 11:18 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> >Okay, I got the same error during a debug run as well.  Here is
> >>>the
> >>> >>>> stack
> >>> >>>> >trace:
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> >TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a
> >>>null
> >>> >>>> >object
> >>> >>>> >reference.
> >>> >>>> >at
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>org.apache.flex.ant::Ant/getValue()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilitie
> >>>>>>>>s\a
> >>> >>>>>nt_o
> >>> >>>> >n_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\Ant.as:216]
> >>> >>>> >at
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags.supportClasses::TagHandler/getAttributeVal
> >>>>>>>>ue(
> >>> >>>>>)[C:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\t
> >>>>>>>>ags
> >>> >>>>>\sup
> >>> >>>> >portClasses\TagHandler.as:73]
> >>> >>>> >at org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Equals/get
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>arg1()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\f
> >>>>>>>>lex
> >>> >>>>>\ant
> >>> >>>> >\tags\Equals.as:43]
> >>> >>>> >at
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Equals/getValue()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-
> >>>>>>>>uti
> >>> >>>>>liti
> >>> >>>> >es\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags\Equals.as:64]
> >>> >>>> >at
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Not/getValue()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-uti
> >>>>>>>>lit
> >>> >>>>>ies\
> >>> >>>> >ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags\Not.as:48]
> >>> >>>> >at org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Condition/get
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>computedValue()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities\ant_on_air\src\org
> >>>>>>>>\ap
> >>> >>>>>ache
> >>> >>>> >\flex\ant\tags\Condition.as:63]
> >>> >>>> >at
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Condition/execute()[C:\p\flexroot\git\fle
> >>>>>>>>x-u
> >>> >>>>>tili
> >>> >>>> >ties\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags\Condition.as:48]
> >>> >>>> >at
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Target/processSteps()[C:\p\flexroot\git\f
> >>>>>>>>lex
> >>> >>>>>-uti
> >>> >>>> >lities\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags\Target.as:168]
> >>> >>>> >at
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>org.apache.flex.ant::Ant/doCallback()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilit
> >>>>>>>>ies
> >>> >>>>>\ant
> >>> >>>> >_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\Ant.as:137]
> >>> >>>> >at
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>InstallApacheFlex/enterFrameHandler()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilit
> >>>>>>>>ies
> >>> >>>>>\ins
> >>> >>>> >taller\src\InstallApacheFlex.mxml:1847]
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> >Looks like there is some problem in parsing a particular tag.
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> >Thanks,
> >>> >>>> >Om
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> >On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:14 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>> >>>> ><bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>> >wrote:
> >>> >>>> >
> >>> >>>> >>
> >>> >>>> >>
> >>> >>>> >> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Justin Mclean
> >>> >>>> >><jus...@classsoftware.com>
> >>> >>>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>>> >>
> >>> >>>> >>> Hi,
> >>> >>>> >>>
> >>> >>>> >>> > Are you still getting that error?
> >>> >>>> >>>
> >>> >>>> >>> Yes.
> >>> >>>> >>>
> >>> >>>> >>> >  I looked at the google analytics report and I dont see it
> >>> being
> >>> >>>> >>> widespread.
> >>> >>>> >>>
> >>> >>>> >>> I don't think it's being reported in the google analytics.
> >>> >>>> >>>
> >>> >>>> >>>
> >>> >>>> >> Okay, I will run it through the debugger and see what's
> >>>happening.
> >>> >>>> >>
> >>> >>>> >> Thanks,
> >>> >>>> >> Om
> >>> >>>> >>
> >>> >>>> >>
> >>> >>>> >>> Justin
> >>> >>>> >>
> >>> >>>> >>
> >>> >>>> >>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to