No, doing that is not currently at the top of my list but I do want to see it happening.
Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone ------ Original message------ From: Christofer Dutz Date: Fri, Feb 20, 2015 11:35 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org; Subject:AW: [FlexJS] Some sort of bundling convention? Are the resources already split up in a way that this can happen ... I remember them being in a pretty mixed up tangle ... Chris -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Gesendet: Samstag, 21. Februar 2015 10:26 An: 'dev@flex.apache.org' Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] Some sort of bundling convention? IIRC, this has been discussed in the past and most folks want option 1. It isn’t near the top of my priority list right now though, but if you want to make it happen, I’d be totally in support. -Alex On 2/21/15, 1:18 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >Hi, > >so I picked up my work with FlexJS and Flexmojos. Unfortunately my >current solution adds the JS stuff as a Plugin dependency to the >flexmojos plugin and the Flash stuff as a normal dependency. >I would like to have something like this to make handing this easier: > >- Option 1: Add the JavaScript resources into the same artifact >inside a pre-defined directory ("js"). > >- Option 2: Create a second archive that contains the js for >each flash module > >For both options it would require to pair the flash and js resources. >When I last worked on this it was different artifacts for flash, but >only one big one for JavaScript. This would make it hard for third >party component developers to provide own flexjs modules. > >Chris >
