On Feb 13, 2015 1:24 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > Would be totally cool. > > I didn’t try the flex sdk npm module, but it looks like it may actually be > downloading the Adobe Flex SDKs. Hopefully the person who put this > together has permission to distribute, and is handling the presentation of > the license agreements for the Adobe bits like airglobal and playerglobal > > IMO, Apache FlexJS via NPM will face similar issues because we still use > playerglobal and airglobal. >
It should be possible to show a prompt, given that it is essentially a JS script. > It would be an interesting task to see if we can make > playerglobal/airglobal optional in FlexJS. I haven’t thought too much > about it, your email got me thinking about it. I think we need > airglobal/playerglobal to develop the FlexJS SWCs, but I think it might be > true that if you are going to write cross-compilable code, the MXML and AS > you write won’t need any of the APIs in airglobal/playerglobal. FB might > require it, although we might be able to stick in a dummy. Isnt that what Chris did in his mavenization work, with the dummy fpg and airglobal swcs? Thanks, Om > > -Alex > > On 2/13/15, 12:53 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Right now installing FlexJS requires either getting the sources and > >building them, or using the Installer to install it. Another nice way > >would be to add it is a npm module [1], which seems to be a popular way to > >install libraries these days. So, simply running > > > >npm install flexjs > > > >should be a great way to get folks to install and try the new SDK. > > > >Any interest in helping build something like this? > > > >Note that there is already an npm module available for the flex sdk [1] > >[2] > > So, we might have a good starting point to add flexjs support. > > > >Thoughts? > > > >Thanks, > >Om > > > >[1] https://www.npmjs.com/ > >[2] https://www.npmjs.com/package/flex-sdk > >[3] https://github.com/JamesMGreene/node-flex-sdk >
