On Feb 6, 2015 7:37 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > On 2/6/15, 1:11 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <t...@extravision.com> wrote: > > >On 05/02/15 16:56, Alex Harui wrote: > >> What do others think? IMO, for 3.2 we should just do the swap of an AS3 > >> native HTTP implementation and not switch our urls to HTTP or add some > >> checkbox. Then we can get better data on how many problems that change > >> solved or if it introduces new issues. Not that I’m volunteering to do > >> that work. > >I vote for doing this. As you say, there's a chance everything will Just > >Work with it. > > Well, Nick is saying there will be other issues. Om, have you run into > the issues Nick brings up? >
No, I have not. But I've never had to deal with large downloads using this library. In any case, I still think we should give it a try. Thanks, Om > -Alex >
