I think the Required/Optional refers more to the fact that you are either unable to build the SDK without that component - Required - or that you can build it without - Optional, you lose functionality though.
So, calling the Embedded Font stuff required doesn't so much reflect on the license (as that is the same as it is for the very much required playerglobal.swc), but on the fact that you need to install it in order to have a functional SDK. Or it may be just a communication issue: you miss functionality when you opt out of the Embedded Font stuff, we may just need to make it clear that not being able to use the FlatSpark skins/components is part of what you lose. EdB On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>> The argument is that since FlatSpark requires the Adobe Embedded Font >>> stuff and the SDK "requires" FlatSpark, we should change the Embedded >>> Font stuff from (Optional) to (Required). >> >> My understanding is that (legally) as i't's not under an Apache compatible >> license it needs to be an optional component. > > Actually, as you agree to the already required 'Adobe Flash Player > playerglobal.swc' license, IMHO you also agreed to the license for the > embedded font stuff... As they are the same license. > > EdB > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
