Still not worse than my 2px padding change to the checkbox skin, think we has had hundreds bad images or something ridiculous. :P
-Mark -----Original Message----- From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of OmPrakash Muppirala Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 4:01 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [4.14] release status update On Jan 7, 2015 7:56 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > On 1/7/15, 7:17 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > > > > - a whole bunch of mobile tests fail > > I looked into this last night. I think there may be several issues, but I > think most failures are caused by a slight change to the graphics for the > BusyIndicator used in the test. The graphics part is the the same exact code. IOW, most ActionBar tests are failing > because a BusyIndicator is used in the test. The BI is mostly occluded by > the AB, but a bit shows through. Yes, that is what I guessed too. I think it has to do with the show/hide, rotate/don't-rotate logic in the BusyIndicator skin. > > Om said he might be checking email, but until he does, does anybody else > know if the graphics change is intentional? It might also be a behavior > change, that the BI was supposed to hide or is rotating when it didn’t > used to or vice-versa. The intention is to keep the graphics just the same, but move the display logic to the new skin. Obviously something weren't wrong with the move, just wrong enough to break the tests. > > Clearing that up might resolve all or most of the failures and then we can > examine what remains. > > > Separately, are we ready to remove the OSMF and SWFObject prompts from the > install scripts? > > -Alex >
