+1 to send these emails to dev.  There should not be too many of these and
the intended audience are not going to be subscribed to commits@

Thanks
On Dec 19, 2014 9:56 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thats a valid argument during a release, not out of IMO.
>
> Btw, wasnt able to get time to test this rc but Im now on Holliday and
> will try to get some time from greece next week  to have a look at it,
> hopefully Ill be able to
>
> --- Message initial ---
>
> De : "Alex Harui" <[email protected]>
> Envoyé : 19 décembre 2014 17:36
> A : [email protected]
> Objet : Re: [4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 41: Successful
>
> We could go with commits@, but I thought dev@ was better because the
> potential voters need to know what changed since they last formulated
> their opinion on the release and all of that discussion is going on dev@.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 12/19/14, 4:43 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Why are these in the dev emails instead commits?
> >
> >-Mark
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> >Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 7:26 AM
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: [4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 41: Successful
> >
> >flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #41 - Successful
> >
> >Changes since last build:
> >[erik] Updated with recently resolved JIRAs
> >
> >[erik] Updated with recently resolved JIRAs
> >
> >[akamud] Changed FlatSpark property to maintain proportions' name to
> >'fixedAspectRatio'
> >
> >
> >For more information, check the console output at
> >
> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/41
> >/.
>
>

Reply via email to