On 12/13/14, 7:51 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Hi Alex, > >you mean if there is something else wrong with the current download >mechanism breaking now and then ;-) >I don't want to re-cite all the benefits I allready posted. For me it >simply looks like a lot of problems we were and are having could be >avoided by this. And in my oppinion it's far more easy to understand how >do add a new compile or test dependency to a pom.xml than it is in order >to add it to our current build. I had quite some trouble adding the >flex-tool-api as I didn't know where I had to add stuff ... with a >pom.xml it would have been as easy as adding this: > ><dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.flex</groupId> > <artifactId>flex-tool-api</artifactId> > <version>1.0.0</version> ></dependency> Again, I think we should wait for others to voice opinions about using external ant tasks. Some folks really didn’t like that we used antcontrib so I went and removed it. But also, just adding that to the pom.xml would fix the build but wouldn’t fix the install script for Falcon that FlexJS uses. -Alex
