On 11/28/14, 1:12 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Hi Alex, > >well I was simply assuming that something is generally not setup >correctly and that one of them could simply check the reason for this and >I was assuming that if we sort out the problem the tests could work fine. Yeah, well it is intentional, although I suppose you could argue it isn’t correct. Think of it this way: I think each version of Java comes with a compiler and some libraries, right? Do the Java compiler folks run tests where they compile the libraries? The library developers must run tests that require compilation. We have the same situation. I did not study how Java or Google Closure does it. If folks have learned from experience that the compiler folks shouldn’t have tests in the main target that compile the library, then maybe we shouldn’t either. -Alex
