+1 Binding

Tested:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/TourDeFlex/1.2/rc1/apache-flex-tour-de-flex-component-explorer-1.2-src.zip
on Windows 7 64 bit, Java 1.8
Good signature from "Justin Mclean <jmcl...@apache.org>"
MD5 checksum matches
Compiles fine

Thanks,
Om


On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
> Package
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/TourDeFlex/1.2/rc1/apache-flex-
> tour-de-flex-component-explorer-1.2-src.zip
> Java 1.6
> OS: Windows Vista x86 6.1
> Source kit signatures match: y
> Source kit builds: y
> README is ok: y
> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
> No unapproved licenses or archives: y
> No unapproved binaries: y
>
>
>
>
> On 11/14/14, 5:40 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >This is a  TourDeFlex 1.2 Release Candidate 1. Please see the
> >RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
> >
> >Changes since the last RC:
> >- Changes to how 3rd party examples are shown (simple image and link)
> >- Commented out some of the 3rd party examples
> >- Fixed issue with Squiggly spelling engine examples
> >
> >The release candidate can be found here;
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/TourDeFlex/1.2/rc1/
> >
> >Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on
> >approving a release?", at:
> >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >
> >Please vote to approve this release:
> >+1 Approve the release
> >-1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> >
> >This vote will be open for at least 72 hours or as long as needed.
> >
> >The vote passes if there is:
> >- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> >- More positive votes than negative votes
> >
> >People who are not in PMC or who are not an committer are also encouraged
> >to test out the release and vote, although their votes will not be
> >binding.
> >
> >Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSS thread not
> >this VOTE thread.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Justin
>
>

Reply via email to