>From WebJars and Jangaroo, I have some experience with Maven artifact packaging of Web resources, and I'd recommend to follow Christofer's advice and bundle everything into a single artifact. Maven *does* allow a module to produce multiple artifacts (using different "classifiers"), but this is rather intended for usages beyond building the actual software, like documentation, sources etc. Greetings -Frank-
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > ?Hi Alex and any others eventually working on FlexJS, > > > I'm still struggling to streamline the Flexmojos integration. Currently it > seems as if I was to compile a FlexJS application to SWF nothing has > actually changed besides the artifacts that I need to reference. When it > comes to JavaScript it's a lot trickier though. I couldn't see a 1-to-1 > match of SWF and JS resources. If it were to stay this way I think Maven > FlexJS support will never be more than a hack causing a lot of traffic of > "noob questions" on the lists. > > > Would it be possible to package the JS parts in the same units as SWFs? > > I was thinking of one of these scenarios: > > - For each FlexJS swc, a matching directory for JS exists > > - For each FlexJS swc a zip containing the JS part exists > > - A FlexJS module consists of a SWF which contains the JS part as static > resources (After all a SWC is a ZIP) > > > The last option would definitely make things in Flexmojos 1000 times > easier than the the others. My runner-up option would be the SWC + ZIP > solution. Last would be the directory (I would simply zip that up when > generating the Maven artifacts). It would be super-duper-awesome, if > FalconJX would be able to work with JavaScript jars/zips directly without > unpacking them, as this would be the cleanest solution. > > > I think these changes would need to be done anyway if tool vendors like > Jetbrains would start adding support for FlexJS natively as they would have > to deal with the same problems. > > > What do you think? I need at least a direction to finish my presentation > ;-) > > > Chris >
