Hi,

I'll also point out that what is currently being looked at it identical to RC0 
that I called a vote on a week ago, so there would be no need to cancel that 
vote and call another one.

There's only been one change made to the release branch which was an addition 
of a MD5 check by Alex and IMO probably should be been checked into develop not 
the release branch but not really an issue either way.

I do see this as a bigger issue on more complex releases if we go down the 
"noRC" path, releases only require 3 +1 and more +1 than -1, in a discussion it 
can be hard to know if someone considers something a minor/major or blocker 
issues unless they state what their voting intention would be. Without RCs/vote 
threads the discussion could conceivably go on for a long time without any 
clear consensus if a vote should even be called or not, prolonging the voting 
process and costing more time for everyone involved.

Thanks,
Justin

Reply via email to