On 10/24/14, 12:19 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> We can go ask the poster what he meant, but I am going to assume he is >>either mistaken > >Bertrand (an ex mentor of our project) usually knows what he talking >about. My records show it was not Bertrand. > >While we've stated osmf as required leaving it out just breaks the spark >video player so it could possibly be considered optional. I don't know >what the answer is here or understand the mandatory/optional distinction >which is why I asked. Technically, it is my understanding that the current build scripts in the source package require the OSMF.swc because the Video components that reference OSMF are in the Spark.swc. but I agree that the binary package does not require it. The inclusion of OSMF was reviewed and approved by the mentors including Bertrand, so I’m confident we are handling this correctly. -Alex
