A challenge, or did you just want to share while you were committing a fix?
EdB
On Friday, October 10, 2014, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote:
> HI,
>
> This code in the badly named output method looks wrong to me:
>
> if (currentStep < stepLabels.length && "\n" +
> stepIDs[currentStep] + ":" == s)
> {
> if (currentStep > 0)
> updateActivityStep(stepLabels[currentStep - 1],
> StepItem.COMPLETE);
> if (currentStep < stepLabels.length)
> updateActivityStep(stepLabels[currentStep++],
> StepItem.ACTIVE);
> }
>
> Justin
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
