The thing is, if I remember correctly, the consensus was that only components with a comprehensive set of Mustella tests would be eligible for ‘promotion’ … This pretty much rules out most of the experimental controls ever doing so.
Unless we are willing to debate loosening this requirement (which I think we should consider), adding - if possible - the ‘experimental’ namespace to the ‘project patch’ would be best. EdB On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com> wrote: > On 01/10/14 07:34, Erik de Bruin wrote: > >> I think a lot of people don’t know about the ‘experimental’ namespace, and >> if they do, are not sure how to use it. They are missing out on a lot of >> really cool controls. >> > Isn't that the idea ? > > If there are a lot of cool things in experimental that people are using > without issues, we should graduate them out of it, so to speak ? > This will mean fixing their (MXML) interface but not a lot else ? > > Tom > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
