@Mihai: Are you testing the Mavenized version or simply the output of the normal ANT build?
Chris ________________________________________ Von: Mihai Chira <mihai.ch...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2014 12:42 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0 I hope so. But from what I remember (and I wasn't the main developer dealing with this), the flex version of the project depended on classes inside the non-flex version, which means that if the wrong compiler argument was used, it would also replace the flex-SpellUI with the non-flex-SpellUI. But again, things may have changed a lot since then. On 2 September 2014 11:38, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> Even if this is not a problem anymore, it might be worth adding a new >> step to the release verification process to create a project without >> Flex and make sure that squiggly works well, and the same for a Flex >> project. > > I think this is just a matter of including the right swcs and not all of them? > > Thanks, > Justin
