It still isn't clear to me. I asked for more clarification. Here are two parts of the last reply on legal-discuss:
"If you want just a spell-checker package, then that is fine. You just can't produce something that requires Category X (whether build or run time)." First he says we can have a package, but then says we can't if it requires Category X, which for practical purposes, this RC does. "Justin: to answer your question: I would expect the English spell-checker to be available under ASF/permissive licensing. The primary language of the product community is English, and so I would expect that to be available. If not... then it doesn't seem like a permissively-licensed project." I don't think this is the case, so I think he's saying we can't release it unless we could find or create an english dictionary that isn't category X. -Alex On 8/31/14 10:19 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >So given the reply on legal would now agree we can release as a separate >package and we can move forward with the vote on the RC? > >Thanks, >Justin
