On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Tom Chiverton <t...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Friday 01 Aug 2014 11:14:19 OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> > I just saw your commit; I am assuming you fixed the issue?
>
> Oh, so it worked despite the error ?
>

Yes, it did.  For the develop branch.  You should subscribe to
comm...@flex.apache.org so that you can see all the commit emails.


>
> Going back in my shell history, I see the first commit was only partly
> working ?
> Counting objects: 118, done.
> Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
> Compressing objects: 100% (22/22), done.
> Writing objects: 100% (22/22), 7.25 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done.
> Total 22 (delta 15), reused 0 (delta 0)
> To https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git
>    6b1330f..ed6da55  develop -> develop
>

Looks like develop was okay.  Develop branch is at ed6da554e currently.
You can see for yourself by looking at https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk.
There is a note on top that says "latest commit ed6da554e9
<https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/commit/ed6da554e931c317717f8e8673e1f698140b0be1>
Tom Chiverton authored an hour ago"


>  ! [rejected]        master -> master (non-fast-forward)
>

Push into Master was rejected because your master is not up-to-date
locally.  But you should not be checking into master on a day to day
basis.  That gets updated by the Release Manager when we push a release.



> error: failed to push some refs to '
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git'
> hint: Updates were rejected because a pushed branch tip is behind its
> remote
> hint: counterpart. If you did not intend to push that branch, you may want
> to
> hint: specify branches to push or set the 'push.default' configuration
> variable
> hint: to 'simple', 'current' or 'upstream' to push only the current branch.
>
>
I think you have 'push all branches' set to true.  You need to disable that
to avoid pushing changes from master.  Or when pushing, you can select a
specific branch to push.



> All the GUIs I've seen just make git worse :-/
>

TortoiseGit has been very good for me.  It integrates with windows explorer
and is pretty neat.

Thanks,
Om


>
> --
> Tom
>

Reply via email to