Hey Om, I agree with you. But instead of arguing this with Justin, can you instead find the time to vote on this package? FalconJX has enough votes. SDK 4.13.0 doesn't unless Justin changes his vote. FlexJS doesn't unless Justin changes his vote.
Justin is getting failures in FlexJS that Peter and I are not getting. If you can successfully build the DataGridExample and otherwise approve the package, then I'll feel better shipping it knowing that at it is working for at least one other person other than Peter and me. Thanks, -Alex On 7/14/14 4:16 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> >wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > It might be a regression, but is it really a release blocker? >> I don't think it's a release blocker but IMO we should be releasing >>better >> quality software especially if we want people to try and it and lend a >>hand >> to fix stuff. > > >It is a vicious cycle. If we don't release often we risk losing the >community's interest. We have been churning on these release candidates >for a quite a bit now. We should resist the urge to fix every little >issue >we find. > > >> Knowing how to compile it correctly helps (the instructions are >>currently >> misleading re FP 11.1) and there's no list of what works or what doesn't >> for the examples. We had the same discussion for the last release and >> nothing improved since then. > > >Expecting one or two people to fix all this within a release is not >reasonable. We need more people working on this. Again, the key to >attracting more volunteers is to getting this SDK into their hands. > >Thanks, >Om > > >> As with all releases if it gets the required 3 +1's (and more +1s than >> -1s) it can be released. >> >> > IMO, we should log a JIRA ticket and address it in the next release. >> Already done see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34416 >> >> Thanks, >> Justin
