Hi Chris, It should be straightforward as long as you don't need to overlay the Falcon compiler in order to have it work in an IDE like FlashBuilder. For Maven, just run the jars with their dependent jars and point at the right flex-config and project files and it should just work. That's how it works using the repos today.
-Alex On 7/12/14 5:10 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >Actually this is what I would like to do for the Mavenizer too ... that I >am able to reference different compiler artifacts and use the classis as >well as the falcon compiler. > >Chris > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] >Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Juli 2014 08:29 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] SDK overlay > >I was looking for the answer you gave in the last paragraph. I don't want >to replace the old compiler, I want Falcon(JX) to co-exist. > >Can we adjust the scripts that create FlexJS to make this happen? > >EdB > > > > >On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 7/11/14 12:39 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >> >Alex, >> > >> >Is it (currently) possible to take a plain, released SDK and overlay >> >FlexJS over that, such that the original SDK will remain fully >> >functional - i.e. >> >pass Mustella? >> I have not tried to pass mustella with Falcon. Since Falcon doesn't >> yet have embedded font support, I would expect tons of errors. >> >> But I have compiled a very large app with Falcon and it compiled and >>ran. >> >> I have not tried to shove anything significant through FalconJX though. >> >> The Overlay is only for IDE integration. If you do not swap out MXMLC >> for Falcon, then an SDK will continue to pass Mustella, and you can >> run Falcon/FalconJX via a launch config. >> >> -Alex >> >> > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
