On Jul 11, 2014 12:08 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> This RC seems to have stalled. Does the silence mean folks really want me
> to spend time fixing up RSL generation in the source kit? It is working
> fine for the binary kit via the installer which is what nearly everyone
> uses. IMO there are much bigger fish to fry. Just need one more vote
> then I'll add mine and we'll be done.
Will try to find time to test it today.
Thanks,
Om
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 7/4/14 12:14 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >On 7/3/14 11:48 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>> 3) run ant frameworks-rsls. The frameworks/flex-config.xml still
> >>>contains
> >>> els entries like:
> >>>
> >>> <!-- Spark SWC-->
> >>> <runtime-shared-library-path>
> >>> <path-element>libs/spark.swc</path-element>
> >>> <rsl-url>spark_${build.number}.swf</rsl-url>
> >>> </runtime-shared-library-path>
> >>>
> >>> That doesn't seem right to me. Seems like that target or some other
> >>> target should fix up the flex-config, no?
> >>
> >>Doesn't seem right to me either, I would of expected frameworks-rsls to
> >>fill in the version numbers.
> >OK, and for the record, the constructFlexForIDE.sh is copying a
> >flex-config.xml from ide/flashbuilder/config that has 0 as the
> >build.number. It is checked into Git that way. That also seems wrong to
> >me. But again, IMO, not a show stopper. The vast majority of folks are
> >using the installer.
> >
> >-Alex
> >
>
