I've 'fixed' the ES6 issue, so the new version of the GCC is good to go. That leaves the 'ant_on_air != ant' issue...
EdB On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > The checksum requirement makes us go into download.xml when updating > anyway, and I like to keep some measure of control over the version, so we > can update at our leisure. For the current update, for example, the > examples will not readily compile due to some changes into the GC parsers > for ES6, apparently. If I can't fix that right away, I can now easily roll > back to the previous version ;-) > > Your 'ant_on_air' had me fooled there. Any suggestions? Do I need to > create an 'exec' task (if possible at all) in 'ant_on_air'? > > EdB > > > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> OK, I thought you automatically wanted to stay up-to-date. So for GCC, we >> just have to keep updating the downloads.xml if we notice GCC has been >> updated? >> >> What about GCL? They only seem to have one zip on their GH site. I >> looked and saw that for Jenkins you are pulling the GCL sources via Git, >> but the installer cannot run Git. >> >> -Alex >> >> >> On 6/26/14 11:41 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >> >We download the compiler source by version number (not "latest"). That >> way >> >we keep control over which version is used and when updating, we can add >> >the correct checksum. >> > >> >EdB >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> > >> >> It will be this weekend at the earliest. Installer is first then SDK >> >> because it has a related LICENSE/NOTICE change, then FalconJX/FlexJS. >> >> >> >> BTW, one concern I have with always using the latest is that we >> checksum >> >> these downloads and the checksum is currently burned into the ant >> >>script. >> >> How can we be flexible with the checksum as new releases come out? I >> >> guess we can have the installer pull a checksum from the -config.xml on >> >> the website and update that. Does that make sense? >> >> >> >> -Alex >> >> >> >> On 6/26/14 11:30 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Hold off for a little bit, please. Google just release a new version >> of >> >> >the >> >> >Compiler, and I want to update and test first ;-) >> >> > >> >> >Will be done in about an hour, either way. >> >> > >> >> >EdB >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks Mark. >> >> >> >> >> >> Actually, I think I am going to cancel this RC and the FlexJS RC and >> >> >>make >> >> >> new ones with Erik's latest upgrades to the most recent GCC and GCL. >> >> >> >> >> >> -Alex >> >> >> >> >> >> On 6/26/14 3:49 PM, "Mark Kessler" <kesslerconsult...@gmail.com> >> >>wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >+1 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >-Mark >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >> >>wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> This is vote for the second (0.0.2) release of the FalconJX (and >> >> >>Falcon) >> >> >> >> compilers. I am not proposing a separate Falcon-only release >> >> >>package at >> >> >> >> this time. The only purpose of the FalconJX packages are to >> >>serve as >> >> >> >> upstream packages for the FlexJS release. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The release candidate can be found here; >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/falcon/0.0.2/rc2/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF >> >> >>requirements >> >> >> >>on >> >> >> >> approving a release?", at: >> >> >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> At a minimum you would be expected to check that: >> >> >> >> - MD5 and signed packages are correct >> >> >> >> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine >> >> >> >> - As this is the first release please carefully check the LICENSE >> >>and >> >> >> >> NOTICE files >> >> >> >> - That the build script completes successfully >> >> >> >> - That you can compile using the results of building the source >> >> >>package >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The source package is set up the same way as the repo. This >> means >> >> >>that >> >> >> >> the results of the build are not the same as the binary package. >> >>The >> >> >> >> compiled source package can be used to build FlexJS apps via the >> >> >>command >> >> >> >> line and Ant, but not in Flash Builder or other IDEs. I tested >> >>the >> >> >> >>source >> >> >> >> package by building it, then pointing to it from the source >> >>package >> >> >>of >> >> >> >>the >> >> >> >> FlexJS release candidate and building the examples in the FlexJS >> >> >> >>package. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The binary package is set up as an upstream package for the >> FlexJS >> >> >> >> release. The most convenient way to use the binary package is to >> >> >> >>install >> >> >> >> a FlexJS SDK via Ant or the Installer. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please vote to approve this release: >> >> >> >> +1 Approve the release >> >> >> >> -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments to why) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be >> >>called. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The vote passes if there is: >> >> >> >> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC >> >> >> >> - More positive votes than negative votes >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Remember that this is an initial 'alpha-quality' release so I >> >>expect >> >> >> >>there >> >> >> >> will be many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and >> >>fix >> >> >> >>bugs >> >> >> >> in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and >> >>enough >> >> >> >> functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the >> >>release >> >> >> >>and >> >> >> >> vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can >> influence >> >> >>how >> >> >> >>the >> >> >> >> PMC votes. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version >> and >> >> >>AIR >> >> >> >> version you tested FlexUnit with. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION >> >>thread >> >> >> >>not >> >> >> >> this VOTE thread. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> For your convenience there is an ant script that automates the >> >>common >> >> >> >> steps to validate a >> >> >> >> release. Instead of individually downloading the package and >> >> >>signature >> >> >> >> files, unzipping, etc, you can instead: >> >> >> >> 1) create an empty folder, >> >> >> >> 2) download into that folder this file: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/falcon/0.0.2/rc2/ApproveFalco >> >> >> >>n. >> >> >> >> xml >> >> >> >> 3) run the script: ant -e -f ApproveFalcon.xml >> >> >>-Drelease.version=0.0.2 >> >> >> >> -Drc=2 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the >> >> >> >>packages >> >> >> >> and build results are always encouraged. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Alex >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >-- >> >> >Ix Multimedia Software >> >> > >> >> >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >> >3521 VB Utrecht >> >> > >> >> >T. 06-51952295 >> >> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >-- >> >Ix Multimedia Software >> > >> >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >3521 VB Utrecht >> > >> >T. 06-51952295 >> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> >> > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
