I will repeat the statements I made earlier. The proposal is to put the Google Copyright, not a License of any sort, in the NOTICE file based on this excerpt from this link: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html "Do images or other media require a copyright line in the NOTICE file?If the media was contributed directly to an ASF project, the contributor has the option to insert their copyright notice in the NOTICE file, as is described for source files <http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#header-existingcopyright>. If the media comes from a third-party source (not contributed directly to the project), then any copyright notice that is obviously associated with the media should be copied into the NOTICE file."
I cannot find any excerpts on any Apache document that would indicate that we should modify the LICENSE file for Google's AL dependency. -Alex On 6/20/14 10:49 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> OK, will look into it. While we're on the subject of the installer, >>does >> anybody have any more input on putting the Google Copyright in the >>NOTICE >> (not LICENSE)? > >Why NOTICE? Everything I've read says that compatible licences do not go >in NOTCE. NOTICE is a lot stronger than LICENSE and required downstream >projects to take other NOTICE files into consideration. > >Justin > >
