The adt.jar fix goes in the SDK's installer.xml and should already be
there.

On 5/29/14 11:41 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Is there a fix in for the missing adt.exe file?  I saw a couple of emails
>about it where you had mentioned that there was fix coming imminently.
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>
>On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> We build a Windows version on the CI server.
>> http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080
>>
>> On 5/29/14 11:07 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I just checked in changes to the FlexJS install script to perform
>> >> checksums on the downloads.  You will need a nightly build of the
>> >> installer to run it, or just use Ant.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Where do I get a nightly build of the Installer?  Or do you mean build
>> >from
>> >Installer source?
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> The Installer has been upgraded to report more information on each
>> >> failure.  I'm not quite sure we have the right information in all
>>cases,
>> >> but hopefully we'll get a better clue as to why we're seeing so many
>> >> failures after we roll out this installer.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Are you reporting this to Google Analytics?  I can start monitoring it
>>and
>> >let you know if the information you are looking for is coming through.
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Note that the new checkums result in a major increase in the total
>>time
>> >>to
>> >> install an SDK.  The ActionScript MD5 code is significantly slower
>>than
>> >> the Java version in Ant.  This could become our new barrier to
>>entry.  I
>> >> will look into optimizing it, but other folks are welcome to take a
>>shot
>> >> at it too.
>> >>
>> >
>> >This is what Installer 2.7 used, right?  In that case, I dont think
>>this
>> >is
>> >a major problem at this point.  Folks are used to long MD5 checks in
>>our
>> >current installers.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Om
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>

Reply via email to