Just tried it, not user friendly :-) but very nice feature to achieve my goal, thanks for the trick.
Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 17:08:31 +0400 > From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > > There's already such action, but we think that it can be useful for IDE > developers only, so it is hidden. To get it add -Didea.is.internal=true > to the *.vmoptions file [1]. Run | Send Commands To Flex Debugger will > appear. Fdb should have (fdb) prompt available when you use it. Dialog > layout may be awful, you'll have to resize it. > > [1] https://intellij-support.jetbrains.com/entries/23395793 > > On 29.05.2014 17:00, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > > Thanks for having made it clearer, got your point but in this case, could > > we imagine a pass through, i.e. in the debug window, an input for commands > > to pass directly to FDB ? > > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > >> Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 16:51:58 +0400 > >> From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > >> > >> On 29.05.2014 16:29, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > >>>> IDE will not set/remove breakpoints per worker, only for all workers, > >>>> this seems to be what users expect. > >>> Really ? look at the Java breakpoint window, it allows to set a BP for > >>> all threads and also for a particular thread if I'm not wrong, why not > >>> for Flex as it is now possible ? we don't have the same needs and > >>> expetactions than the Java devs ? > >> In Java you can't select thread for which to set the breakpoint. You can > >> select what to suspend when breakpoint is hit: affected thread only or > >> all threads. Translating to Flash it means: > >> - suspend all threads (default in Java): when breakpoint is hit, iterate > >> all workers with 'worker X' and send 'halt'; > >> - suspend affected thread only: default fdb behavior. > >> In Java there's nothing similar to 'set breakpoint for selected thread > >> only' and I can hardly imagine UI for it. > >> As a start I think I'll support default fdb behavior, i.e. suspend only > >> affected worker. > > >
