On 4/10/14 3:07 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 4/10/14 2:46 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB >>4.7? >> Yes. I found out that FB is actually using a 4.x number in the >><version> >> tag in the descriptor and doesn't try to parse the version in the >> "description". >> >> -Alex >> >> >This is what I see in flex-sdk-description.xml: > ><flex-sdk-description> ><name>Apache Flex (FlexJS) 0.0.1 FP11.1 AIR3.9 en_US</name> ><version>4.0.1</version> ><build>20140408</build> ></flex-sdk-description> > >I don't see a "description" element? Did you mean the "name"? Yes. Sorry about that. > >If this is the case, how will it affect other IDEs? That's what I want to find out. > >Will it be better if we add a new element called "flexjsversion" and set >it >to the real one for others to use?' We'll see what they need, if anything. -Alex
