Well, this comparative table comes from us, we asked Fred to let us publish something about BlazeDS vs. LCDS vs. GraniteDS...
I think we shouldn't go into details in a general page about third-party solutions. And we have to cover different kind of technologies such as IDEs, client-side frameworks, code generators tools and server solutions. A detailed comparative table wouldn't fit for this purpose. Thanks, Franck. 2014-03-20 17:59 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>: > Fred recently added this page on the wiki [1] > Maybe you can use this as a starting point and improve on it? > > Thanks, > Om > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Flex+Server+Technologies+-+Comparative+table > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Franck Wolff <frawo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2014-03-20 17:03 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>: > > > > > > > > > On 3/20/14 8:37 AM, "Franck Wolff" <frawo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >3) Not sure to understand what you mean here... Do you want to make > sure > > > >that nobody is mentioning "Adobe Flex" anymore? > > > No, you can still mention "Adobe Flex", but it is important that your > web > > > site use the Flex trademark correctly as per > > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ and help to notify that world > > that > > > Flex is now at Apache. > > > > > > Adobe did not care as much about proper use of the Flex trademark, but > > the > > > Apache does. > > > > > > > I can certainly make sure that GraniteDS website is linking back to > Apache > > Flex (we already do that) and following the Apache trademark policy (if I > > understand what it is about ;) > > > > However, I can't verify that all related projects are complying to your > > request and I'm certainly not the right person to ask them to do so... > > > > I should have a first draft next week. > > > > Thanks, > > Franck. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > >
