We need the noise created by the 4.12 SDK to force people to upgrade to Installer 3.0. Otherwise folks wont upgrade. Then, when we release Installer 3.0, folks will have a lot of confusion about what that is about. We have seen this in the past.
Unless we want to launch FlexJS with a lot of fanfare which might give the same boost to Installer 3.0? On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as>wrote: > I think if we expect that the installer is going to be approved within a > week of the SDK, we should really do them both at the same time. No need > to make two separate announcements... > > Just my thoughts... > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com > >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > We need to wait for the Installer 3.0 binaries to be voted on and > staged. > > Why? The 2.7 installer works fine with 4.12. As far as I can see the > > releases are independent of each other. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin >