Hi Carlos. That's good news. The image didn't come through to my email though.
I'm not worried about stripping things out for IntelliJ that FB required. We'll have to keep them around to keep FB happy. As long as IntelliJ thought the FlexJS folder was a valid SDK that's great! Do you think FlexJS users are going to be satisfied with having to setup a build.xml for their projects? That's the main reason we did launch configs for FB, so users could just create new FB projects and compile them without having to mess with Ant. Thanks, -Alex From: Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com<mailto:carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>> Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" <dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>> Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:41 PM To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" <dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>> Subject: Re: [FLEXJS] Intellij (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC2) Hi Alex, in IntelliJ things seems more easy since I really doesn't need the launch configs like the ones in FB. For example, I add the build.xml file and running it from the IDE is sufficient for me then I test it in a browser. I think IntelliJ needs a valid Flex SDK, but don't know if in this IDE we already can remove some legacy things that are needed in FB. If you share a list off things I could remove I could test it and report results. There's some strange things: For example, the project builds successfully but at the end of the log it reports "fail"...don't know why right now since all it's ok. Btw, I'm trying to create a typical TODO List sample to get more familiar with the framework (I already commit the initial example classes), and I think I'll make a separate thread to ask some related things about FlexJS internals. I attach an image so you can see the final result (very promising, isn't it? :)).[Imágenes integradas 1] 2014-02-26 23:04 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>>: It will be great to find out what IntelliJ's assumptions about a Flex SDK are. For FB, the main issue was the introduction of new compiler options like mxml.children-as-data. FB couldn't accept them in flex-config.xml because we're still using MXMLC and ASC2.0 to compile the code so for FB we have these eclipse launch configurations that you run in order to compile and/or cross-compile the code. The installer creates these launch configs. Maybe we'll have to create a set for IntelliJ as well. Someday we'll feel confident enough to not ship MXMLC in a FlexJS release at all and rely on Falcon and then we may be able to get rid of the launch config requirement. -Alex On 2/26/14 10:18 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com<mailto:carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>> wrote: >+1 > >Note: I finally get it working updating my /etc/launchd.conf to point >JAVA_HOME to java7 >I think this should be referenced for mac installations >(my next step is try FlexJS sdk with IntelliJ IDEA for initial basic use) > > > >2014-02-26 18:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui ><aha...@adobe.com<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>>: > >> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.0 to be >> released. >> >> Issues addressed in this release: >> - Installer upgraded to run ant scripts in the binary packages it >>installs. >> - Dev builds are now hidden by default. To see dev builds, right-click >> and choose >> "Show Dev Builds" >> - You can enable a cache of downloads by right-clicking and configuring >> the cache >> >> The Apache Flex SDK 4.12.0 RC2 is configured to use ant scripts for >> installation. >> You can determine that the ant script is running because the order of >>the >> options >> has the font libraries last (otherwise the remoting option is last). >>The >> installer >> should also be able to install the Nightly for FlexJS. If you want to >>try >> installing >> a nightly for Falcon or FalconJX, please choose an existing Flex SDK >> folder. >> >> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/ >> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/> >> >> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms, >> available here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/binaries >> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/binaries> >> >> As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version. >> >> Before voting please review the sections: >> What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at >> http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >> >> Vote >> [ ] +1 Approve the release >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> Regards, >> Alex >> >> >> > > >-- >Carlos Rovira >Director de Tecnología >M: +34 607 22 60 05 >F: +34 912 94 80 80 >http://www.codeoscopic.com >http://www.directwriter.es >http://www.avant2.es -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.directwriter.es http://www.avant2.es
