On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > On 2/26/14 12:42 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>3. Falcon should be able to compile FXG now, but I think it will use > >>Spark > >> components like Group. The compiler either needs to output different > >> primitives or we need to fake up lighter weight Spark components. I'd > >> strongly prefer the first option. > >> > > > >I think I understand. Can we break this up into a very simple use case > >and > >see which direction we want to go? I may need a bit of hand holding on > >this one. > > Was FXG always embedded? > > You can also instantiate it just like a component in MXML. If you embed it, the compiler seems to rasterize it and you will lose the scaling, etc. properties that makes vectors so attractive. > Is there a way to "embed" SVG? > Yes, just like an image: [Embed(source="logo.svg")] [Bindable] public var imgCls:Class; Adobe had deprecated it. But, at Apache Flex, we un-deprecated it a while ago. Thanks, Om > > Anyway, yes a simple test case would help us find the desired workflow and > fix what is needed. > > -Alex > >
