On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

> The correct behavior is for the itemRenderer to have an instance of
> ClassFactory (which should have a newInstance method as your source code
> indicated) and not the class ClassFactory which would not have newInstance
> on it since newInstance isn't static.
>
> If itemRenderer is an instance of ClassFactory but doesn't have a
> newInstance method then something is still wrong with your setup.
>
>
Wrong with the example app or wrong with my flex-asjs setup? I have a clean
flex-asjs repo in sync with git.
What is the correct way to build the FlexJSJX, etc. swc files?


> BTW, I assume you've done a "clean" on the project from FB?
>
>
Yes, multiple times :-)


> -Alex
>
> On 2/3/14 3:33 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I think the issue is that the series itemRenderer may be set to actual
> >> ClassFactory class instead of an instance of ClassFactory.
> >>
> >> Can you check that in the debugger?
> >>
> >>
> >You are right, the method MXMLDataInterpreter.generateMXMLArray() passes
> >an
> >instance of type mx.core.ClassFactory to BarChartSeries.itemRenderer.  No
> >error at this point, rather when itemRenderer.newInstance() is called, the
> >error is thrown.
> >
> >
> >> Make sure that you don't have stale duplicates of classes like
> >> BarChartSeries and IChartSeries.  The itemRenderer property should be of
> >> type Ifactory unless it is stale.
> >>
> >
> >BarChartSeries and IChartSeries look good to me. In the FlexJSJX project,
> >org.apache.flex.charts.supportClasses has these methods:
> >        private var _itemRenderer:IFactory;
> >        public function get itemRenderer():IFactory
> >        {
> >            return _itemRenderer;
> >        }
> >        public function set itemRenderer(value:IFactory):void
> >        {
> >            _itemRenderer = value;
> >        }
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 2/3/14 12:36 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:32 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >> ><bigosma...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Does your copy of ClassFactory (in FlexJSUI/src/mx/core) have a
> >> >>> newInstance method?
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, it does.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Did you shutdown and re-start FB?  I think it caches SWC and locks
> >> >>>them on
> >> >>> the disk.
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> Tried shutting down FB, copying over the files again and restarted
> >>FB.
> >> >> Same result when I compile the app with FlexJS Debug build tool.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Check a link-report and see which version of ClassFactory is being
> >> >>>pulled
> >> >>> in.
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> This is what I see in the linkreport.xml entry for
> >>mx.core:ClassFactory:
> >> >>
> >> >>     <script
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>name="C:\p\flex_os\workspace\FlexJS\FlexJSSDK_ViaInstaller\frameworks\a
> >>>>s\
> >> >>libs\MXMLCClasses.swc(mx.core:ClassFactory)"
> >> >> mod="1390855527301" size="410" optimizedsize="190">
> >> >>       <def id="mx.core:ClassFactory" />
> >> >>       <pre id="mx.core:IFactory" />
> >> >>       <pre id="Object" />
> >> >>       <dep id="Class" />
> >> >>     </script>
> >> >>
> >> >> Looks okay?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Note:  I was not able to add the -link-report=linkreport.xml addition
> >>to
> >> >the FlexJS Debug tool config.  It seems to confuse the compiler.
> >> >
> >> >I had to add the link report compiler option by going into Project >
> >> >Properties > Flex Compiler > Additional Compiler Arguments.
> >> >
> >> >Not sure if this makes a difference.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -Alex
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 2/3/14 11:23 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >I made some changes to the FlexJSJX classes and tried to use that
> >> >>>with my
> >> >>> >exisisting FlexJS SDK.  Here is what I am doing:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >1.  In the \flex-asjs\frameworks\as folder, run ant.  The following
> >> >>>swc
> >> >>> >files: FlexJSJX, FlexJSUI and MXMLCClasses get created under
> >> >>> >\flex-asjs\frameworks\as\libs folder.
> >> >>> >2.  Copy these swc files to the
> >> >>> >"FlexJSSDK_ViaInstaller\frameworks\as\libs"
> >> >>> >folder
> >> >>> >3.  Refresh FB project and compile the BarChartExample app with the
> >> >>> >"FlexJS
> >> >>> >(Debug Build)" tool
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >This is the error message I am seeing.  Note that I dont see such
> >> >>>errors
> >> >>> >when I run with the installed SDK's swc files.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >Also, I see a file size difference between the ones that came with
> >>the
> >> >>> >installer vs. the ones that I built.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >I have a feeling this could be related to the flash playerversion
> >> >>>value,
> >> >>> >could it be?  I selected 11.9 during the installation process.
> >>Does
> >> >>>this
> >> >>> >matter?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >Or is it possible that there are some uncommitted files that was
> >>used
> >> >>>to
> >> >>> >build the FlexJS binaries.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >ReferenceError: Error #1069: Property mx.core:IFactory::newInstance
> >> >>>not
> >> >>> >found on mx.core.ClassFactory and there is no default value.
> >> >>> >    at org.apache.flex.charts.beads::ChartItemRendererFactory/set
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>strand()[C:\p\flex_os\workspace\flexroot\git\flex-asjs\frameworks\as\
> >>>>>>pr
> >> >>>>oje
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>cts\FlexJSJX\src\org\apache\flex\charts\beads\ChartItemRendererFactor
> >>>>>>y.
> >> >>>>as:
> >> >>> >76]
> >> >>> >    at
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>org.apache.flex.core::UIBase/addBead()[C:\p\flex_os\workspace\flexroo
> >>>>>>t\
> >> >>>>git
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>\flex-asjs\frameworks\as\projects\FlexJSUI\src\org\apache\flex\core\U
> >>>>>>IB
> >> >>>>ase
> >> >>> >.as:231]
> >> >>> >    at
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>org.apache.flex.html.staticControls::List/addedToParent()[C:\p\flex_o
> >>>>>>s\
> >> >>>>wor
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>kspace\flexroot\git\flex-asjs\frameworks\as\projects\FlexJSUI\src\org
> >>>>>>\a
> >> >>>>pac
> >> >>> >he\flex\html\staticControls\List.as:107]
> >> >>> >    at
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>org.apache.flex.core::UIBase/addElement()[C:\p\flex_os\workspace\flex
> >>>>>>ro
> >> >>>>ot\
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>git\flex-asjs\frameworks\as\projects\FlexJSUI\src\org\apache\flex\cor
> >>>>>>e\
> >> >>>>UIB
> >> >>> >ase.as:268]
> >> >>> >    at
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>org.apache.flex.utils::MXMLDataInterpreter$/generateMXMLArray()[C:\p\
> >>>>>>fl
> >> >>>>ex_
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>os\workspace\flexroot\git\flex-asjs\frameworks\as\projects\FlexJSUI\s
> >>>>>>rc
> >> >>>>\or
> >> >>> >g\apache\flex\utils\MXMLDataInterpreter.as:192]
> >> >>> >    at
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>org.apache.flex.utils::MXMLDataInterpreter$/generateMXMLInstances()[C
> >>>>>>:\
> >> >>>>p\f
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>lex_os\workspace\flexroot\git\flex-asjs\frameworks\as\projects\FlexJS
> >>>>>>UI
> >> >>>>\sr
> >> >>> >c\org\apache\flex\utils\MXMLDataInterpreter.as:224]
> >> >>> >    at
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>org.apache.flex.core::ViewBase/addedToParent()[C:\p\flex_os\workspace
> >>>>>>\f
> >> >>>>lex
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>root\git\flex-asjs\frameworks\as\projects\FlexJSUI\src\org\apache\fle
> >>>>>>x\
> >> >>>>cor
> >> >>> >e\ViewBase.as:43]
> >> >>> >    at
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>org.apache.flex.core::Application/addElement()[C:\p\flex_os\workspace
> >>>>>>\f
> >> >>>>lex
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>root\git\flex-asjs\frameworks\as\projects\FlexJSUI\src\org\apache\fle
> >>>>>>x\
> >> >>>>cor
> >> >>> >e\Application.as:289]
> >> >>> >    at
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>org.apache.flex.core::Application/initHandler()[C:\p\flex_os\workspac
> >>>>>>e\
> >> >>>>fle
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>>xroot\git\flex-asjs\frameworks\as\projects\FlexJSUI\src\org\apache\fl
> >>>>>>ex
> >> >>>>\co
> >> >>> >re\Application.as:101]
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >Thanks,
> >> >>> >Om
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to