Since the files are signed you can host them on your domain too. This is what we did with Flex 4.6 RSLs. We had the config check both adobe and then fall back to our servers. Since they are signed it would put them in the RSL cache either way.
Now obviously it can only be hosted on your server and it gets stored in your clients temp browser cache. Still functional for multiple apps from the same domain, but obviously more frequently downloaded. -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Balderson [mailto:n...@joeflash.ca] Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2014 3:21 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Framework Linkage Change What I meant was, if Adobe ever gave Apache the ability to sign Flex SWZ files which _could_ be accepted by the Flash Player, it would not be a very secure model, as it would merely be inheriting the weaknesses of the Adobe SWZ system. Which is why the deprecation of SWZ files in favour of using corporate-hosted Flex framework RSLs is actually a better system anyways.
