Congratulations.

I do need to change to a new sdk-installer-config-4.0 because the format
needs to change to make it Ant compatible.  I'll look to see what the
badge needs to know in order to handle that.

Thanks for the head up,
-Alex

On 1/12/14 3:21 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Haven't been able to follow this thread much (at the hospital with my
>newborn :-) )
>
>Just wanted to remind folks that installer config .xml drives the website
>badge installer as well as enables the auto-update mechanism for the
>Installer.
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>On Jan 11, 2014 10:58 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Update:  I've adjusted this plan a bit.  There were issues like the
>> installer.xml wants a basedir.  I could copy it into the destination
>> directory and run it from there, but then I have to not overwrite it
>>when
>> expanding the package.  Also, the installer.xml wants to load some
>> properties from files.
>>
>> However, what I want to know before the package is expanded is the
>> licensing information which shouldn't rely on basedir.  So my new plan
>>is
>> to create installer-config.xml files with the licensing info and we'll
>>put
>> those next to the release packages.  Then the installer can pick that up
>> early, offer up the licenses, then expand the package and run the
>> installer script inside.
>>
>> Let me know if you see any problems with this approach,
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 1/10/14 2:25 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >> Interesting.  So we'd put the installer.xml files up separately on a
>> >> server somewhere as part of release distribution?
>> >
>> >Could be either -  but outside the zip with the release distribution
>> >seems fine to me.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Justin
>>
>>

Reply via email to